The Lost Generation’s Props Essay Example for Free

The Lost Generations Props actThe significance of the Mr. In and Mr. Out scene toward the end of Fitzgeralds May Day is that it reveals a last(a) hurrah for Dean and Gordon. For Gordon especially, because he realizes that he result forever be married to Jewell and that suicide is his solitary(prenominal) escape from this life. The depression of this era, of Gordon not fulfilling his full potential as an artist (his excuse universe that he needs to go to art school but doesnt have enough money to go to art school). It is this idea of potential, of finding identity in post-war America (or in this case during the war) that Fitzgeralds improvident story hinges upon.Either man attended Yale and had the best opportunities afforded to them, but their mutually exclusive hate for for each one other for ending up in the life they have now (their after Yale life, their, not in the war life). Either mans drunken stupor, their In Out gag is a revelation of lack of identity. Faulkner s writing style is very colloquial. He gives the reader a real enjoy of the character, a real dip into the characters possess mind, no matter how fragile, insane, or lame their subjective reality may be.Hemingways language in Hills Like White Elephants is prosy in comparison (although some(prenominal) authors use adjectives with a certain flare). Hemingways writing is more obsessed or so the environment. Hemingway also uses a fair amount of dialogue to juxtapose the natural elements of the setting of the story. Hemingway is caught up in the movement of things the movement of the girl looking toward the horizon and the dualism of character and nature. Faulkner doesnt juxtapose his characters with environment in this fashion, rather he juxtaposes action with characters.Fitzgeralds character, Gordon Sterret, is a dark and ill man, both in phlegm and in spirit. Fitzgerald relays this characterization to the reader through use of Gordons actions (his continually getting drunk, espe cially in the presence of Edith whom he may have love, but whom he ultimately falters with). The main action being that he goes with Jewell against his judgment and Deans advice and in the end of the story, feeling as though he cannot control his actions and is a pawn of fate, he kills himself thereby exercising the only control over himself that he thinks he has violent death himself.Similar to this Lauras character in Flowering Judas doesnt present her will into her life. She allows Braggioni to try and seduce her, and even though shes tired from her day and doesnt much distribute for the mans attention she doesnt ask him to leave her alone. She remains proper with her social determine as not wanting to offend anyone. This lack of control over her environment reflects Gordons own sentiments. both(prenominal) Laura and Braggionis relationship and Gordon and Jewells relationship are similar. Jewell and Braggioni are forceful with their personalities on Gordon and Laura.Both endu re their partners knowing that the world offers them nothing better, or that they themselves cannot find a way of escape. However, instead of killing herself as Gordon does, Laura inadvertently kills one of Braggionis adherents. Thus, she is labeled a murderer. In either case, Laura and Gordon are both characters that feel they are not in control of themselves or the events that occur around them, either a war, or a revolution.Works CitedThe Heath Anthology of American Literature, Vol. II, ed. Lauter, et al (Vols. C, D, and E).