Elizabeth Bishop’s “The Hanging of the Mouse” Reaction Paper

Elizabeth Bishops The hanging of the Mouse, places animals in the roles of homo in reference to an execution. The writer uses animals to replace humans to possibly washstandalize a message or point of view towards the close penalty. In the fib, the common mackerel is existence executed for what we believe is some sort of crime. It isnt clear whether or not the lift actually committed a crime, but we are led to believe that an act occurred in which caused the mouse to be executed on this particular day. The writer doesnt gravel their opinion on bully punishment or the devastation penalty.As the story plays out, all the writer is doing is uttering a story of a mouse and incorporating all these diverse animals. Every animal has a different role. And each role is specific to want happens in a hanging. A raccoon, wearing the traditional black mask, was the executioner. A large praying mantis was in charge of the religious end of the ceremonies. (Barnet, Cain, & Burto, 2010 , p. 1309) Is the writer trying to tell the reader something? It isnt clear, but the writer does convey the hardship of ceremony such a thing occur.Most of the animals present a intemperate time watching the hanging. It was all so touching that a spew out, who had brought her youngster in her mouth, shed several large tears. They rolled down on to the childs back and he began to squirm and shriek, so that the have thought that the sight of the hanging had perhaps been too much for him, (Barnet, Cain, & Burto, 2010, p. 1310). Stereotypically mice extraction prey to cats, and in this case, the cat feels remorse, sadness for what happens to the mouse.This theory can operate to a thought that not everyone who believes in capital punishment can withstand to watch the punishment be carried out. Reading through the story, the writer doesnt have a specific reader in mind. This story can easily be read by a immense majority of different people and each one may have a different take on its meaning. Small children wouldnt pull in from a story like this, because questions would arise as to why the mouse is being punished? Young adults and adults would find the story an interesting read.Each, again, may grasp a different meaning or have a different feeling towards the story, only because of the different backgrounds may be involved. The Hanging of the Mouse brought to light a few questions on my feelings on capital punishment and the death penalty. Questions like Do I believe in capital punishment? , Do I believe in the death penalty? and Can I withstand to watch someone clog up in front of my eyes? crossed my mind as a read through the story. The death penalty should be carried out depending on the crime committed, and I dont believe that I am one to watch the punishment to be carried out.I would be that cat feeling remorse and sadness for what was happening in front of me. The brave line in the story, but an excellent moral lesson, nevertheless. (Barnet, Cain, & Burto, 2010, p. 1310) sticks out the near from the entire story. Having the belief that the death penalty should be carried out, but not being able to watch such an eventshould children and teens be suit to such things? For sure this would teach them a lesson on what happens when extremely naughtiness crimes are committed, but is that a lesson that should be taught in that way?Elizabeth Bishops very short story brought up more questions than outcomes. Its grateful to read something that may have a clear message, e. g. the agreement of having the death penalty, but it could mean so much more. Questions arose to the feelings of victims watching the execution and children being taught a valuable lesson. There isnt a clear answer and I dont believe that was the design of the writer. Overall the intention was to have thoughts, to have conversations about the underlying topic.