History Of Popular Culture

In primeval upstart Europe fiestas were the scene for heroes and their stories, to be celebrated by the creation. They posed a change from their general livelihood. In those days population lived in remembrance of one fete and in expectance of the next. Different kinds of fetes were celebrated in various ways. at that property were fiestas that pronounced an individual occasion and werent part of the festival calendar, like family festivals such as weddings and christenings.Some took place at the afore express(prenominal) measure two year and ere for anyone, like confederacy festivals like the different saints days. Pilgrimages took place every told year round. Annuals festivals like Christmas and midsummer always took place on the same day every year. In those days the average village in Western Europe celebrated at least 17 festivals annually, not counting family occasions and saints days. Some festivals, such as fair, lasted several days or whatsoevertimes until now several weeks. In the Netherlands funfair started every year at the 11th of November (St.Martin) and culminated in a big festival of Dranck, pleijsier ende vrouwen (Drink, drama and wo custody) at the end of the genus Circus eriod, preceding the plosive speech sound of change. Festivals were meant to bear external the minds of the plurality out their everyday life, off the hard times and their work. universal life in Early Modern Europe was filled with rituals, two religious and secular. Songs and stories played an important role in their lives, although they sometimes alter the details of the legends and stories to fit the way they thought a reliable festival should dramatise place.Popular culture was miscellaneaed with ecclesiastic culture in many ways. The story of St. John the Baptist is a reasoned use of this. The past ritual f bathing and lighting fires during Midsummers eve was a remnant of a ritual from the pre-Christian period. Fire and water, symbols of purification, could be seen as the tools of St. John the Baptist, and therefore a combination of the two elements of democratic and ecclesiastical culture was obvious. It looks as if the Medieval Church took over the festival and do it theirs.The same thing happened to the Midwinter Festival, which became linked with the birth of Christ, on 25 December. thither are many more than examples to be grade, such as the association between St. Martin and geese ca employ by the fact that the St. Martins Day (11 November) coincided with the period during which the deal used to kill their geese in the period preceding the Christian period. genus Circus plays a special role in normal culture in Early Modern Europe. It is a great example of a festival of images and texts. It was a usual festival, taking on different levels in different regions of Europe. out from regional variations, these differences were to a fault caused by factors such as the climate, the political em placement and the economical situation in an area. On a whole Carnival started in late December or early January and reached ts peak upon go up Lent. The actual junket, taking place at the end of the festive period, could take days and would usually involve large quantities of diet and drinks. The festival took place in the open air in the centre of a township or city. Within a region, the way Carnival was celebrated alter from town to town.The festival was a play, with the streets as a stage and the people as actors and spectators. They ofttimes depicted everyday life scenes and do fun of them. Informal up to nowts took place throughout the Carnival period. There was massive eating and imbibing, as a way of stocking up for Lent. People sang and danced in the streets, using the special songs of Carnival, and people wore masks and fancy-dress. There was verbal aggression, insults were exchanged and satiric verses were sung. More formally structures events were concentrated in the last days of the Carnival period.These events took places in the central squares and were often organised by clubs or fraternities. The briny theme during Carnival was usually The World Upside Down. Situations got turned around. It was an enactment of the world turned upside down. Men dressed up as women, women dressed up as men, the rich traded places with the poor, etc. There was physical nose candy people standing on their heads, horses going rearwards and fishes flying. There was reversal of relationships between man and beast the horse shoeing the stamp down or the fish eating the fisherman.The opposite reversal was that of relationships between men servants giving states to their masters or men feeding children while their wives worked the fields. more events centred on the figure of Carnival, often depicted as a fat man, cheerful and surrounded by regimen. The figure of Lent, for contrast, often took the form of a thin, old woman, dressed in black and hung with fish. These depictions varied in form and name in the different regions in Europe. A recurring element was the performance of a play, usually a farce. sneer battles were also a favourite pass-time during the Carnival period.Carnival usually terminate with the defeat of Carnival by Lent. This could happen in the form of the gibe trial and execution of Carnival, (Bologna, Italy, 16th century), the beheading of a pig (Venice, Italy), or the burial of a sardine (Madrid, Spain). So what was the implication of Carnival in Early Modern Europe? Was it merely an condone for the populace to go crazy or did Carnival have a deeper eaning hidden behind the facade of food, violence and sex? Carnival was a holiday, a game. It was a time of ecstasy and liberation. The form was determined by three major themes food, sex and violence.It was the time of indulgence, of abundance. It was also a time of intense sexual activity tables of the seasonal movement of conceptions in eighteenth century France show a peak around February. Carnival was also a festival of aggression, destruction and desecration. It was the ideal time to insult or pester people who had wronged someone, often in the form of a mock battle of a football match. A time for paying off old grudges. Serious violence was not avoided and in most areas the place of serious crimes and killings went up during Carnival. It was also a time of opposition, in more than one way.It opposed the ecclesiastical ritual of Lent. Lent was a period of fasting and abstinence of all things enjoyed by the people, not just food and drink but also sex and recreation. The elements that were taken out of life during Lent were emphasised during Carnival. every(prenominal) that was portrayed by the figures of Carnival and Lent (fat versus thin). Carnival was polysemous, meaning different things to different people in ifferent areas. In different regions, different heroes were celebrated. Sometimes elements were taken over from other regions. Carnival did not have the same importance all over Europe.In the north of Europe (Britain, Scandinavia) it was less important than in the rest of Europe. This was in all probability partly due to the climate which discouraged an elaborate street festival at that time of the year. In these regions, people preferred to elaborate the festivities during the Midsummer festival (St. Johns Eve). Two reasons for this are the gentile survivals that were stronger in these regions, partly because they were solated from the rest of Europe due to geographical obstacles, causing a lesser ecclesiastical influence, and the climatic situation as mentioned above.Carnival was a festival in extremis, but elements of Carnival can be found in every festival that was celebrated in Early Modern Europe. During the harvest season, all over Europe festivals and rituals were held. The harvest was celebrated, again, with elaborate drinking and eating, although in a more moderate way than the Carniva l celebrations. every(prenominal) these festival had one thing in common they offered the people an function from their everyday life and a way to express themselves. It offered the people a way to vent their resentments and some form of entertainment.Festivals were an escape from their struggle to enlighten a living. They were something to look forward to and were a celebration of the community and a display of its ability to put on a good show. It is said that the mocking of outsiders (the neighbouring village or Jews) and animals might be seen as a dramatic expression of community solidarity. Some rituals might be seen as a form of social control, in a sense that it was a means for a community to express their discontent with certain embers of the community (charivari).The ritual of public punishment can be seen in this light, as it was used to deter people from committing crimes. Professor Max Gluckman used the African popular culture to explain the social function of the rit ual of reversal of roles as it happened during rituals as Carnival. Similar rituals still occur in certain regions in Africa. Gluckman explains this ritual as an emphasis of certain rules and taboos through lifting them for a certain period of time. The apparent protests against the social order were intended to observe and even to trengthen the established order.As a counter example Gluckman states that ? in regions where the social order is seriously questioned, rites of protest do not occur. Riots and rebellions much took place during major festivals. Rebels and rioters employed rituals and symbols to legitimise their actions. Inhibitions against expressing hostility towards the authorities or individuals were weakened by the excitement of the festival and the consumption of large quantities of alcohol. If those factors were unite with discontent over a bad harvest, tax increases or other calamities, this ituation could get out of control.It could prove a good opportunity for people excluded from power to try and enforce certain changes. It is hardly surprising that members of the upper berth classes often suggested that particular festivals ought to be abolished. They felt threatened by the populace who during festivals well-tried to revolt against the ruling classes and change the economical situation they were in. The revitalize of popular festivals was instigated by the will of some of the educated to change the attitudes and invest of the rest of the population ( to improve them).This reformation took on different forms in different regions and it took place at different moments in time. There were also differences in the practices that were being reformed. Catholics and Protestants opposed to different elements of popular festivals and they did so for different reasons. Even within the Protestant movement, the views towards reformation of festivals and popular rituals varied. Missionaries on both sides worked in Europe to install their religio us values in the topical anaesthetic people.Reformers on both sides objected in particular to certain elements in popular holiness. Festivals were part of popular religion or were at least draped as an element of popular religion. The festival of Martinmas (11 November) was a good example of this. What were the protests of the authorities against these elements of popular culture in general and popular religion in particular? There were two essential religious objections. Firstly, the absolute majority of festivals were seen as remnants of quaint paganism.Secondly, the festivals offered the people an occasion to over-indulge in immoral or offensive behaviour, at many occasions attacking the establishment (both ecclesiastical and civil). The first objection meant that reformers disliked many of the popular customs because they contained traces of ancient customs dating from pre-Christian times. Protestant reformers went very far in their objections, even denouncing a number of C atholic rituals as being pre-Christian survivals, considering the saints as successors of pagan gods and heroes, taking over their curative and protective functions.Magic was also considered a pagan remnant the Protestants accused the Catholics of practising a pagan ritual by claiming that certain holy places held magical powers and could cure people. The reformers denounced the rituals they didnt find designation as being irreverent and blasphemous. Carnival and the charivaris were considered the work of the devil, because it made a mockery of certain godly elements the Church held sacred. The reformers thought people who didnt honour God in their way to be heathen, ill-fated to spend their afterlife in eternal damnation.Flamboyance was to be chased out of all religious aspects of culture, and, where possible, out of all other aspects of life, check to the Protestant doctrine. In some areas, gesturing during church services was banned, as was laughter. All these things were seen as irreverent, making a mockery of religion. All these changes were introduced in order to create a sharper separation between the sacred and the plunder. The ecclesiastical authorities were out to annihilate the traditional familiarity with the sacred because familiarity breeds irreverence.The objection against popular recreations stemmed from the idea that they were vanities, displeasing God because they were a molder of time and money and distrait people from going to church. This objection was divided by both the ecclesiastical and civil authorities. The latter mainly bjected because it distracted the populace from their work, which in turn affected the revenues of the leading upper classes, or from other activities that were benefiting the rich, reasons that would vary per region.Catholic and Protestant reformers were not equally irrelevant to popular culture, nor were they hostile for quite the same reasons. Protestant reformers were more subject, denouncing festivals as relics of popery and looking to abolish feast-days as well as the feast that came with it, because they considered the saints that were celebrated during these festivals as remnants of a pre-Christian era. Many of these Protestant reformers were equally radical in their attacks on holy images, which they considered idols.During the end of the 16th and the first fractional of the 17th century Dutch churches were pillaged by Protestants trying to destroy all religious relics and images (de Beeldenstorm). Catholic reformers were more modified in their actions they tried to reach a certain modification of popular religious culture, even trying to adapt certain elements to the Catholic way of worshipping and incorporating popular elements into their religion. They insisted that some times were holier than others, and they id object to the extend to which the holy days were celebrated with food and drink.Some argued that it was impossible to obey the rites of Lent with proper reverenc e and awe if they had indulged in Carnival just before. Catholic reformers also installed rules in order to regulate certain popular festivals and rituals, such as a banishment on dressing up as a member of the clergy during Carnival or a prohibition on dancing or perform plays in churches or churchyards. Contrary to the Protestant reformers however, the Catholic reformers did not set out to abolish estivals and rituals completely.Civil authorities had their own reasons to object to popular festivals in Early Modern Europe. Apart from taking the people away from work or other obligations, the authorities feared that during the time of a festival, the abundance of alcohol could stir up the feelings of discontent the people had been hiding all throughout the year. Misery and alcohol could create a dangerous mix that would give people the courage they needed to rebel against authorities. This was a good reason for the authorities to try and stop, or at least control, popular festiva ls.